Refine your search
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Garg, K. C.
- Scientometric Profile of Indian Science as Seen Through Science Citation Index – Expanded 2010-2011
Abstract Views :341 |
PDF Views:12
Authors
K. C. Garg
1,
S. Kumar
2
Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi-110012, IN
2 Pusa Gate, New Delhi 110 01, IN
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi-110012, IN
2 Pusa Gate, New Delhi 110 01, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 50, No 5 (2013), Pagination: 529-542Abstract
An analysis of 90958 papers published by Indian scientists and indexed by Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) during 2010-2011 indicates that academic institutions produced the highest number of papers contributing about 43% of the output. The highest number of papers was published in the discipline of chemical sciences. Highest impact as judged by the values of CPP and RCI was also made by chemical sciences. About 83% papers were published in journals originating froum outse India. US journals were the most preferred choice for publishing papers. About half of the papers were published in medium impact factor journals and 66% papers were cited one or more times. Indian Institute of Science (Bangalore) published the highest number of papers; and the Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (Bangalore) made the highest impact.Keywords
Scientometric Profile, Citation Per Paper (CPP), Relative Citation Impact (RCI).References
- Nakamura, K., Hagiwara, K., Hikasa, K. et al, Journal of Physics G-Nuclear and Particle Physics, 37 (7A) Jul 2010, 1 – 1422.
- Cohen, Myron S., Chen, Ying Q., McCauley, Marybeth et al New England Journal of Medicine, 365 (6) Aug 11, 2011, 493 – 505.
- Kumarasamy, Karthikeyan K, Toleman, Mark A., Walsh, Timothy R. et al, Lancet Infectious Diseases, 10 (9) Sep 2010, 597 – 602
- Granger, Christopher B., Alexander, John H., McMurray, John J. V. et al, New England Journal of Medicine, 365 (11) Sep 15, 2011, 981 - 992
- Boehme, Catharina C., Nabeta, Pamela, Hillemann, Doris et al, New England Journal of Medicine, 363 (11) Sep 9, 2010, 1005 - 1015
- Speliotes, Elizabeth K., Willer, Cristen J., Berndt, Sonja I. et al, Nature Genetics, 42 (11) Nov 2010, 937 - U53.
- Kantarjian, Hagop, Shah, Neil P., Hochhaus, Andreas et al, New England Journal of Medicine, 362 (24) Jun 17, 2010, 2260 - 2270.
- Connolly, Stuart J., Eikelboom, John, Joyner, Campbell et al, New England Journal of Medicine, 364 (9) Mar 3, 2011, 806 - 817.
- Hudson, Thomas J., Anderson, Warwick, Aretz, Axel et al, Nature, 464 (7291) Apr 15, 2010, 993 – 998.
- Butchart, Stuart H. M., Walpole, Matt, Collen, Ben et al, Science, 328 (5982) May28, 2010, 1164 – 1168.
- Scientometric Profile of Vector Borne Diseases: A Case Study of Global Japanese Encephalitis Research
Abstract Views :341 |
PDF Views:10
Authors
Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIRNISTADS), Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi110012, IN
2 H.C. P.G. College, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, IN
3 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, CSIR-NISTADS Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi110012, IN
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIRNISTADS), Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi110012, IN
2 H.C. P.G. College, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, IN
3 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, CSIR-NISTADS Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi110012, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 50, No 5 (2013), Pagination: 543-554Abstract
An analysis of 2074 papers published on different aspects of Japanese Encephalitis (JE) during 1991 to 2010 and indexed by Science Citation Index-Expanded indicates that the output increased many folds since 1991 except for a significant dip in 2005. These papers were scattered in 501 journal titles, which originated from 29 different countries. Total output came from 62 countries of which 14 countries contributed 90% of the total output. The highest number of publications came from USA, followed by India. The publication activity increased significantly in China, South Korea, France, Austria, Singapore, Germany and decreased for Japan in the second block. Data indicates that about 87% of the total output is concentrated among 15 sub-disciplines and the remaining in other 53 sub-disciplines. Highest output (18%) is in the sub-discipline of virology. Among the prolific institutions, the publication output of institutions from the USA and Taiwan had higher impact. Citation per Paper (CPP) and Relative Citation Impact (RCI) were more than average for USA. All the Indian institutes listed under prolific institutions had made only a low impact.Keywords
Scientometric Profile, Vector Borne Disease, Citation Per Paper (CPP), Relative Citation Impact, Japanese Encephalitis Research.References
- Kato, H; Takeuchi O; Sato, S. et.al. Osaka University, Nature 441(2006)101-105.
- Makangie, J. S; Gubler D.J; Petersen L.R., Curtin University, Nature Medicine 10 (2004) 98-109.
- Rigue-Perez, J.G; Clark, G.G; Gubler D.J. et.al. CDC, Lancet 352 (1998) 971- 977.
- Mukhopadhyay, S; Khun Raj; Rossman, M.G, Purdue University, Nature Reviews Microbiology 3 (2005)13-22.
- Steele, K.E; Linn, M.J; Schoepp, R.J. et.al. Wild Life Conservation Society, Veterinary Pathology 37 (2000) 208-224.
- Farinati, F; Cradin, R; Demaria, N. et.al. Baptist Medical Centre, Journal of Hepatology 22 (1995) 449-456.
- Gubler D. J, US Department of Health and Human Service, Archives of Medical Research 33 (2002) 330-342.
- Westaway, E.G; Mackenzie J.M; Kenney, M.T. et.al. University Queensland, Journal of Virology 71 (1997) 6650-6661.
- Sejwar,J.J; Hadda M.B; Tierney, B.C. et.al. CDCP, JAMA- Journal of the American Medical Association 290 (2003) 511-515.
- Devis, B.S; Chang G.J.J; Cropp, B. et.al. US Department of Health and Human Service, Journal of Virology 75 (2001) 440-447.
- Oliphan, T; Eagle, M; Nybakken, T. et.al. ,Washington University, Nature Medicine 11 (2005) 522-530.
- Vaughn D.W; Hoke, C., Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Epidemiological Reviews 14 (1992)197-221.
- Brinton M.A., Georgia State University, Annual Reviews of Microbiology 56 (2002) 371-402.
- Querec, T; Bennouna, S; Alkan, S.K. et.al. Emory University, Journal of Experimental Medicine 203 (2006) 413-424.
- Ratston R; Thudium, K; Berger, K. et.al. Chiron Corp, Journal of Virology 67 (1993) 6753-6761.
- Hann, J.N; Richie, S.A; Philips, D.A., Queensland Health, Medical Journal of Australia 165 (1996) 256-260.
- Fournier, D; Mutero, A., University of California, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C- Pharmacology Toxicology and Endocrinology 108 (1994) 19-31.
- Mason, P.W; Pincus, S; Fournier, M.J. et.al. Yale University, Virology 180 (1991) 294-305.
- Krishan, Manoj N; Ng. Alwin; Sukumaran, Bindu et.al. Yale University, Nature 455 (2008) 242-245.
- Citation Analysis of Ph.D. Theses Submitted to the University of Delhi in Social Sciences during 1995-2008
Abstract Views :449 |
PDF Views:17
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, IN
2 14 F Vikrant Apartments, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi 110 085, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, IN
2 14 F Vikrant Apartments, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi 110 085, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 51, No 6 (2014), Pagination: 363-368Abstract
The study presents an analysis of citation pattern of Ph.D. theses in social sciences awarded by the University of Delhi during 1995-2008. The study identifies how the pattern of submissions has changed during 1995-2008 in different disciplines of social sciences, besides studying distribution of citations by document types, pattern of authorship of cited documents, cited Indian and foreign authors and chronological distribution of citations. The ranked lists of core journals also have been presented. The analysis reveals that 51,889 citations were made to 259 theses in social sciences. The analysis of these citations shows that books are the most preferred source of citations in all disciplines except economics and constitutes about 55.5% of total citations. The authorship pattern reveals that single authored citations constitute about 86 per cent citations. The chronological distribution of citations shows that the period ranging from 1991 to 2000 is the most cited period. The analyses of journals ranking shows that Economic and Political Weekly published from India is the most cited journal.Keywords
Citation Analysis, Social Science, Ph.D. Theses, University of Delhi, Journal Ranking.- Scientometric profile of organic chemistry research in India during 2004–2013
Abstract Views :280 |
PDF Views:105
Authors
Affiliations
1 Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221 005, IN
2 CSIR-National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
1 Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221 005, IN
2 CSIR-National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 109, No 5 (2015), Pagination: 869-877Abstract
An analysis of 17,344 papers published by Indian scientists and indexed by Web of Science in the discipline of organic chemistry and its sub-disciplines during 2004-2013 indicates that the Indian output has increased significantly in the later period. Academic institutions contributed about 46% of the total output followed by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) with 26% of the total output. The most prolific institutions among them mainly belonging to academic institutions and CSIR contributed about 60% of the total output. The value of citation per paper for most of the prolific institutions was higher than the Indian average. Similar trend was observed for the relative citation impact. Indian researchers in the discipline of organic chemistry published their papers in international journals with impact factor greater than 1. About 11% of the papers published by Indian scientists in the discipline of organic chemistry during 2004-2013 remained uncited.Keywords
Bibliometric indicators, citation analysis, organic chemistry, scientometricsReferences
- MacCoss, M. and Baillie, T. A., Organic chemistry in drug discovery. Science, 2004, 303(5665), 1810–1813.
- Varaprasad, S. J. D. and Ramesh, D. B., Activity and growth of chemical research in India during 1987–2007. DESIDOC J. Libr.Inf. Technol., 2011, 31, 387–394.
- Guay, Y., Emergence of basic research on the periphery: organic chemistry in India, 1907–1926. Scientometrics, 1986, 10,77–94.
- Nagpaul, P. S. and Pant, N., Cross-national assessment of specialization patterns in chemistry. Scientometrics, 1993, 27, 215–235.
- Karki, M. M. S. and Garg, K. C., Scientometrics of Indian organic chemistry research. Scientometrics, 1999, 45, 107–116.
- Karki, M. M. S., Garg, K. C. and Sharma, P., Activity and growth of organic chemistry research in India during 1971–1989. Scientometrics,2000, 49, 279–288.
- Karki, M. M. S. and Garg, K. C., Bibliometrics of alkaloid chemistry Research in India. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1997, 37, 157–161.
- Kumari, G. L., Synthetic organic chemistry research: analysis by scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 2009, 80, 559–570.
- Jain, A., Garg, K. C., Sharma, P. and Kumar, S., Impact of SERC’s funding on research in chemical sciences. Scientometrics,1998, 41, 357–370.
- Garg, K. C., Kumar, S. and Dutt, B., Impact of SERC’s funding on research. Curr. Sci., 2007, 93, 1114–1121.
- Salini, C. P., Nishi, P., Vishnumaya, R. S. and Mini, S., A bibliometric evaluation of organic chemistry research in India. Ann. Lib. Inf. Stud., 2014, 61, 332–342.
- Nishi, P., Parvatharajan, P. and Prathap, G., Visibility and impact of the Indian Journal of Chemistry Section B during 2005–2009 using scientometric techniques. Indian J. Chem. Sect. B, 2012, 51,269–284.
- Nagaiah, K. and Srimannarayana, G., Publications in organic chemistry from Indian universities and laboratories. Curr. Sci., 2015, 105, 176–183.
- Garg, K. C. and Kumar, S., Scientometric profile of Indian science as seen through Science Citation Index Expanded 2010–2011, SRELS J. Inf. Manage., 2013, 50, 529–542.
- Uncitedness of Indian Scientific Output
Abstract Views :271 |
PDF Views:97
Authors
K. C. Garg
1,
S. Kumar
1
Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 107, No 6 (2014), Pagination: 965-970Abstract
An analysis of 35,640 papers published by Indian scientists as journal articles and reviews in journals indexed by Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) in 2008 revealed that 6231 (17.5%) papers remained uncited during 2008-2013. Most of the uncited papers were published by State Agricultural Universities and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. The highest proportion of uncited papers was in the discipline of agricultural sciences followed by multidisciplinary and mathematical sciences. These uncited papers appeared in journals published from India, Singapore, Romania and Japan with low impact factor (IF). Lowest number of uncited papers was published by the Department of Biotechnology. It was also found that a small fraction of papers published in journals with IF more than 5 also remained uncited.Keywords
Citation Analysis, Scientific Output, Scientometrics, Uncitedness.- Publication Delay of Manuscripts in Periodicals Published by CSIR-NISCAIR
Abstract Views :254 |
PDF Views:96
Authors
Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 111, No 12 (2016), Pagination: 1924-1928Abstract
Publishing in scholarly peer-reviewed journals causes long delays from submission to its subsequent publication. This may be due to the long peer-review process or backlog of manuscripts waiting in line in the journals. The present study examines the publication delay in 13 journals published by CSIR-NISCAIR at three different stages. These were delays between receipt of manuscript and its revision, editorial delay, revision and its subsequent publication, i.e. technical delay, and the total delay. The study examined 1223 articles published in these 13 journals in the year 2015, except for 1 journal for which data for 2104 have been used. The analysis indicates that the publication delay varied from one discipline to another and from one journal to another journal. The highest time delay was found to be for the Indian Journal of Chemical Technology, and lowest for the Indian Journal of Chemistry - A. The total publication delay varied between 5.2 and 22.4 months. In most of the journals, the reason for delay was technical.Keywords
Scholarly Publishing, Review Time, Peer-Reviewed Journals, Technical and Editorial Delay.- Scientometric Profile of Global Male Breast Cancer Research
Abstract Views :300 |
PDF Views:84
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
2 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
2 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 09 (2017), Pagination: 1814-1821Abstract
An analysis of 4165 papers published during 2005-2014 on male breast cancer and indexed by Science Citation Index-Expanded indicates that the publication output in this nascent field is increasing steadily. The output is scattered among 91 countries, and USA ranks first in the publication output as well as impact in terms of citations per paper (CPP) and relative citation impact (RCI). The global compound annual growth rate during the period of study is 6.2. Change in transformative activity index is highest for the People's Republic of China (PRC). However, impact of research output is low for PRC. The research output is highly scattered in terms of prolific institutions, authors and journals publishing research results. Most of the prolific institutions are located in USA. Among the prolific institutions, the highest value of CPP and RCI was for Massachusetts General Hospital (USA), and among authors the highest value of CPP and RCI was for Thompson D. from the University of Cambridge (England).Keywords
Citation Analysis, Male Breast Cancer, Publication Output, Scientometric Assessment, Transformative Activity Index.References
- Sasco, A. J., Lowenfels, A. B. and Pasker-de Jong, P., Epidemiology of male breast cancer. A meta-analysis of published case control studies and discussion of selected aetiological factors. Int. J. Cancer, 1993, 53, 538–549.
- Young, I. E. et al., The CAG repeat within the androgen receptor gene in male breast cancer patients. J. Med. Genet., 2000, 37, 139–140.
- William, B. G. et al., Experiences of men with breast cancer: an explanatory focus group study. Br. J. Cancer, 2003, 89, 1834–1836.
- Giordano, S. H. et al., Breast carcinoma in men: a population based study. Cancer, 2004, 101, 51–57; doi:10.1002/cncr.20312.
- France, L. et al., Male cancer: a qualitative study of male breast cancer. Breast J., 2000, 9, 343–348.
- Moodley, J. et al., A bibliometric analysis of cancer research in South Africa: study protocol. BMJ Open, 2015, 5, e006913; doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006913.
- Biglu, M. H., Breast cancer in Iran: the trend of Iranian researchers’ studies in medline database. Basic Clin. Cancer Res., 2014, 6(1), 22–32.
- Perez-Santos, J. L. M. and Anaya-Ruiz, M., Mexican breast research output, 2003–2012. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2013, 14, 5921–5923.
- Nazir, T., Samriya, S. and Debba, F., Scientometric study of BRCA (breast cancer) research: an assessment of publication and country share, growth rate and h-index. Res. Rev.: J. Oncol. Haematol., 2015, 4, 5–17.
- Glynn, R. W., Schutaru, C., Karin, J. M. and Sweeney, J. K., Breast cancer research output, 1945–2008: a bibliometric and density equalizing analysis. Breast Cancer Res., 2010, 12, R108; doi:10.1186/bcr2795.
- Guan, J. and Ma, N., A comparative study of research performance in computer science. Scientometrics, 2004, 61(3), 339–359.
- Karki, M. M. S. and Garg, K. C., Bibliometrics of alkaloid chemistry research in India. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1997, 37, 157–161.
- Kumar, S. and Garg, K. C., Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China. Scientometrics, 2005, 64, 121–132.
- Dwivedi, S., Kumar, S. and Garg, K. C., Scientometric profile of organic chemistry research in India during 2004–2013. Curr. Sci., 2015, 109, 869–877.
- Garg, K. C., Kumar, S., Madhavi, Y. and Bahl, M., Bibliometrics of global malaria vaccine research. Health Inf. Lib. J., 2009, 26, 22–31.
- Dutt, B., Kumar, S. and Garg, K. C., Scientometric profile of global dengue research, COLLNET. J. Scientometrics Inf. Manage., 2010, 4, 81–91.
- Bibliometrics of Information Technology:Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
Abstract Views :283 |
PDF Views:31
Authors
Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Maurice Nagar, Delhi − 110007, IN
3 Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology, Sector 22, Rohini, Delhi − 100086, IN
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Maurice Nagar, Delhi − 110007, IN
3 Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology, Sector 22, Rohini, Delhi − 100086, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 54, No 6 (2017), Pagination: 277-284Abstract
The study presents a bibliometric analysis of 270 papers presented at the international conference “Information Technology: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow” organized by the Defence Scientific Information and Documentation Center (DESIDOC), Delhi, of the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) during February 19-21, 2015. The study indicates that more than half of the total presentation was contributed by academic institutions (universities and colleges). Distribution of contributions by country and Indian States indicates that out of 270 papers, only seven were from foreign countries and rest 263 from India. Delhi topped the list among the contributing cities, while DESIDOC topped the list among the contributing institutions. Output of authors by gender indicates that male authors contributed more than female authors. The distribution of references cited in the papers shows that among the different information sources, journal citations were the highest and highest number of cited journals was in the discipline of library and information science. The highest number of cited journals was being published from the USA.Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Bibliometrics, Conference, Digital Services, Electronic Resources, Information Technology, Networking.References
- Ali A. (2006). Ane’s Encyclopedic Dictionary of Library and Information Science,1, New Delhi, Ane Books India, p.206.
- Kumar A, Prakasan ER, Kalyane VL and Kumar V. (2008).Pramana: A Journal of Physics, Annals of Library and Information Studies. 55(1): 201−11.
- Garg KC, Sharma P and Kumar S. (2008) Scientometric profile of the journal Mausam, Annals of Library and Information Studies. 55(1):76−80.
- Kumar M and Moorthy AL. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology during 2001-2010, DESIDOC J. Lib. and Inf. Technol.31(3):203−08.
- Garg KC and Anjana AK. (2014). Journal of intellectual property rights: A bibliometric study, DESIDOC J. Lib. and Inf. Technol. 34(1):66−73.
- Bartneck C and Hu J. (2009). Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2009), Boston, p. 699−708. DOI: Crossref.
- Shamir L. (2010). The Effect of Conference Proceedings on the Scholarly Communication in Computer Science and Engineering. Scholarly and Research Communication. 1(2).Retrieved on 10 March, 2017. Available at: www.src-online.ca. Crossref.
- Lisee C, Lariviere V and Archambault E. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(11):1776–84. Crossref.
- Garg KC and Kavita. (2015). A Bibliometric study, Papers presented at the International Conference The Role of Science and Technology in Global Development, LIS Links, 1(4):2−8.
- Garg KC and Bebi. (2015). Content to connectivity: Paradigm shifts in knowledge innovation, information representation, information management systems and librarianship, Library Herald. 53(4):414−23. Crossref.
- Garg KC, Dutt B and Kumar S. (2006). Scientometric profile of Indian science as seen through Science Citation Index, Annals of Library and Information Studies.53(3):114−25.
- Madani S., Carnevale RJ, Duda S, Feyder M and Aronsky D.(2006). Prevalence and inaccessibility of URLs in the biomedical literature. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, p. 1019. American Medical Informatics Association, 2006. PMCid: PMC1839732.
- Collaboration Patterns of Indian Scientists in Organic Chemistry
Abstract Views :265 |
PDF Views:76
Authors
Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, IN
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 114, No 06 (2018), Pagination: 1174-1180Abstract
An analysis of 17,344 papers published by Indian scientists and indexed by Web of Science in the discipline of organic chemistry during 2004–2013 indicates that collaborative coefficient has increased during the later years (2011–2013). Of the total published papers, 6312 (36.4%) were due to domestic and international collaboration. The share of papers in domestic collaboration was 77.3% (4882) and international collaboration was 22.7% (1430). Among the international collaborating countries, India had published highest number of papers with the USA followed by Germany. Academic institutions followed by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) contributed the highest number of papers in domestic as well as in international collaboration. However, the value of domestic collaborative index and international collaborative index was less than 100 for both the sectors. The labs funded by CSIR also topped the list of institutions having domestic and international collaborative papers. The compound annual growth rate in domestic and international collaborative papers was 4.7 and 5.3 respectively. The value of domestic collaborative index was highest for CSIR-CDRI, Lucknow and international collaborative index for Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai.Keywords
Academic Institutions, Collaboration Pattern, Collaborative Index, Organic Chemistry.References
- National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 1998. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA, 1998, pp. 5–43, 5–44, A-310 and Appendix Table 5-52.
- Ecosystem Management Initiative, Collaboration, Michigan, 2002; www.snre.umich.edu/ecomgt/collaboration/definitions.htm (accessed on 16 April 2017).
- Katz, J. S. and Martin, B. R., What is research collaboration? Res. Policy, 1997, 26(1), 1–18.
- Glanzel, W., Schubert, A. and Czerwon, H. J., A bibliometrtic analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 1999, 45(2), 185–202.
- Basu, A. and Vinu Kumar, B. S., International collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scientometrics, 2000, 48(3), 381–402.
- Prakasan, E. R. et al., Scientometric facts on the international collaborative Indian publications, Curr. Sci., 2014, 106(2), 166–169.
- Gupta, B. M., Munshi, U. M. and Mishra, P. K., S&T collaboration of India with other South Asian countries. Curr. Sci., 2002, 83(10), 1201–1209.
- Gupta, B. M. and Karisiddappa, C. R., Collaboration in theoretical population genetics speciality. Scientometrics, 1998, 42(3), 349–376.
- Garg, K. C. and Padhi, P., A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics, 2001, 51(2), 415–427.
- Dutt, B. and Nikam, K., Scientometrics of collaboration pattern in solar cell research in India. Ann. Lib. Infor. Stud., 2014, 61(1), 65–73.
- Bibliometric study of India’s scientific publication outputs during 2001–10: evidence for changing trends, Department of Science and Technology, DST, New Delhi, July 2012; http://www.nstmisdst.org/PDF/Evidencesofchangingtrends.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2017).
- He, T., International scientific collaboration of China with G7 countries. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(3), 571–582.
- Ma, N. and Guan, J., An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publication in molecular biology, Scientometrics, 2005, 65(3), 343–355.
- Kim, M.-J., Korean international co-authorship in science 1994–1996. J. Inf. Sci., 1999, 25(5) 403–412.
- Kwon, K. S., Park, H. W., So, M. and Leydesdorff, L., Has globalization Strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the 18 Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 2012, 90(1), 163–175; doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0512.
- Garg, K. C. and Dwivedi, S., Pattern of collaboration in the discipline of Japanese encephalitis, DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2014, 34(3), 241–247.
- Owusu-Nimo, F. and Boshoff, N., Research collaboration in Ghana: patterns, motives and roles, Scientometrics, 2017, 110(3), 1099–1121; doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2221-x.
- Dwivedi, S., Kumar and Garg, K. C., Scientometric profile of organic chemistry research in India during 2004–2013, Curr. Sci., 2015, 109(5), 869–877.
- Ajiferuke, I., Burrel, Q. and Tague, J., Collaborative coefficient: a single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 1988, 14(5–6), 421–433.
- De Solla Price, D. and Beaver, D. B., Collaboration in an invisible college. Am. Psychol., 1966, 21(11), 1011–1018.
- Collaboration Pattern in Male Breast Cancer Research
Abstract Views :288 |
PDF Views:82
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library & Information Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221005, IN
2 CSIR-National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110012, IN
1 Department of Library & Information Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221005, IN
2 CSIR-National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110012, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 115, No 5 (2018), Pagination: 845-850Abstract
An analysis of 4168 research papers on male breast cancer (MBC) published by different countries and indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded during 2005–2014 indicates that only 15% of the papers were non-collaborative and the rest were published either in domestic or international collaboration. The sub-field of MBC had a high proportion of domestic collaboration. The number of papers written with domestic collaboration was almost three times the number of papers written with international collaboration. The value of co-authorship index (CAI) decreased in single-, twoand multi-authored papers in the second block 2010–2014 as compared to the first block (2005– 2009). Higher value of CAI for mega-authored papers reflects higher collaborative coefficient (CC) in 2010–2014. The highest value of CC is for the sub-field S9 (genetics and heredity). This is also indicated by the highest value of CAI for mega-authored papers in this subfield. Among 17 highly productive institutions, CC value is more or equal to the global value of CC for 10 prolific institutions.Keywords
International Collaboration, Male Breast Cancer, Research Publications.References
- Bozeman, B. and Boardman, C., Research collaboration and team science: a state of the art review and agenda. Assessing Research Collaboration Studies: A Framework for Analysis, Springer, London, Chap 1, 2014.
- Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. and Uzzi, B., The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 2007, 316(5827), 1036–1039.
- Bennett, L. M. and Gadlin, H., Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. J. Invest. Med., 2012, 60(5), 768–775; doi:10.231/JIM.0b013e318250871d.
- Adams, J., Collaborations: the fourth age of research. Nature, 2013, 497, 557–560; doi:10.1038/497557a.
- Glanzel, W., National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 2001, 51, 69–115.
- Wagner, C. S. and Leydesdorff, L., Mapping the network of global science: comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. Int. J. Technol. Globalisation, 2005, 1(2), 185–208.
- Wagner, C. S., The New Invisible College, Brookings Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
- Persson, O., Glänzel, W. and Danell, R., Inflationary bibliometrics values: the role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 2004, 60(3), 421– 432.
- Low, W. Y., Ng, K. H., Kabir, M. A., Koh, A. P. and Sinnasamy, J., Trend and impact of international collaboration in clinical medicine papers published in Malaysia. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2), 1521–1533; doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1121-6.
- Prakasan, E. R., Mohan, L., Girap, P., Surwase, G., Kademani, B. S. and Bhanumurthy, K., Scientometric facts on international collaborative Indian publications. Curr. Sci., 2014, 106(2), 166–169.
- Basu, A. and Kumar, B. S. V., International collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scientometrics, 2000, 48(3), 381–402.
- Garg, K. C. and Dwivedi, S., Pattern of collaboration in the discipline of Japanese encephalitis. DESIDOC J. Lib. Infor. Technol., 2014, 34(3), 241–247.
- Gupta, B. M. and Karisiddappa, C. R., Collaboration in theoretical population genetics speciality. Scientometrics, 1998, 42(3), 349– 376.
- Garg, K. C. and Padhi, P., A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics, 2001, 51(2), 415–427.
- Shrivats, S. V. and Bhattacharya, S., Forecasting the trend of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 2014, 101, 1941–1954; doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1364-x.
- Dwivedi, S., Garg, K. C. and Prasad, H. N., Scientometric profile of global male breast cancer research. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(9), 1814–1821.
- Ajiferuke, I., Burrel, Q. and Tague, J., Collaborative coefficient: a single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 1988, 14(5–6), 421–433.
- De Solla Price, D. and Beaver, D. B., Collaboration in an invisible college. Am. Psychol., 1966, 21(11), 1011–1018.
- De Solla Price, D., The analysis of scientometric metrics for policy implications. Scientometrics, 1981, 3(1), 47–54.
- Frame, J. D., Mainstream research in Latin America and Caribbean. Interciencia, 1977, 2(3), 143–148.
- Schubert, A. and Braun, T., Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 1986, 9(5–6), 281–291.
- Bordons, M., Gomez, I. and Teresa, F. M., Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 1996, 37(2), 279–295.
- Bibliometric Study of CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT) during 1990–2019
Abstract Views :278 |
PDF Views:10
Authors
Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110012, IN
2 Delhi Public Library, Chandni Chowk, New Delhi - 110006, IN
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110012, IN
2 Delhi Public Library, Chandni Chowk, New Delhi - 110006, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 57, No 6 (2020), Pagination: 309-318Abstract
The study examines the pattern of growth of papers published by CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (IHBT) during 1990-2019; identifies most prolific authors and their citation impact, communication pattern of scientists in terms of journal publishing country and impact factor of these journals as well as the pattern of domestic and international collaboration. Analysis of data indicates a consistent growth of output during the study period except a decline in 2019-2020. Publications appeared in journals published from the advanced countries of the West and more than half of the papers were published in medium, high and very high impact factor journals. The output is highly scattered in terms of journal publication as one-third of the papers were published in 28 journals. Only about 8% papers remained uncited and rest were cited one or more times. Of the 20 highly cited papers, six women scientists acted as first author. The study found that more than half of the papers were published in domestic and international collaboration. USA was the most collaborating country and academic institutions were found to be most domestic collaborating institutions in India as well as abroad. Among all the Indian institutions, Guru Nanak Dev University (Amritsar) was most collaborating domestic institution and University of Vienna, Austria from abroad.Keywords
Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis, Collaboration, Communication Behavior, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT).References
- Banshal, S. K. Singh, V. K. Basu, A. and Muhuri, P. K. (2017). Research performance of Indian Institutes of Technology. Curr. Sci., 112(5): 923-932. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i05/923-932.
- Garg, K. C. and Padhi, P. (1999). Scientometrics of institutional productivity of laser science and technology. Scientometrics, 46: 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766293.
- Garg, K. C. and Rao, M. K. D. (1988). Bibliometric analysis of scientific productivity: A case study of Indian Physics Laboratory. Scientometrics, 13: 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019962.
- Garg, K. C., Dutt, B. and Kumar, S. (2006). Scientometric profile of Indian science as seen through Science Citation Index. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 53(3): 114-125.
- Garg, K. C., Kumar, S. and Bebi. (2018). Collaboration patterns of Indian scientists in organic chemistry. Current Science, 114(6): 1174-1180. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i06/1174-1180.
- Gupta, B. M., Kshitig, A. and Gupta R. (2015) Contribution and citation Impact of CSIR, India publications during 2007-11. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, 6(1): 169-182. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976 9668.149118. PMid: 25810657, PMCid: PMC4367031.
- Jeyshankar, R., Ramesh Babu, B. and Rajendran, P. (2011). Research output of CSIR-Central Electro Chemical Research Institute (CECRI): A study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 58(4): 301-6.
- Prathap, G. and Gupta, B. M. (2009). Ranking of Indian engineering and technological institutes for their research performance during 1999-2008. Curr. Sci., 97: 304-306.
- Prathap, G. (2013). Benchmarking research performance of the IITs using WoS and Scopus bibliometric databases. Curr. Sci., 105(8): 1134-38.
- Prathap, G. (2014). The performance of researchintensive higher educational institutions in India. Curr. Sci., 107(3): 389-96.
- Sahu, A. K., Goswami, N. G. and Choudhary, B. K. (2011). Research publications of National Metallurgical Laboratory during the year 2001- 2010 - A study on citation patterns. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 58(2): 151-60.
- Suma, S. and Sudhier, K. G. P. (2014). Publication pattern of scientists of CSIR National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (NIIST), Thiruvananthapuram: A scientometric study. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 51(4): 205-14.
- Bibliometric Study of CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT) during 1990 – 2019” published in SRELS Journal of Information Management volume 57 (6) December 2020 pages 309-318
Abstract Views :242 |
PDF Views:5
Authors
Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110012, IN
2 Delhi Public Library, Chandni Chowk, New Delhi - 110006, IN
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110012, IN
2 Delhi Public Library, Chandni Chowk, New Delhi - 110006, IN